[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files)
From: |
Richard M Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files) |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:57:49 -0400 |
I mean, this is a misnomer which gives the illusion that there is such
a thing as "no conversion", even though in reality there always is some
conversion going on.
`no-conversion' used to really mean no conversion.
Why has that changed?
- Re: ^M in the info files, (continued)
- Re: ^M in the info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/19
- Re: ^M in the info files, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/21
- Re: ^M in the info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/21
- Re: ^M in the info files, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/21
- Re: ^M in the info files, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/09
- "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Kenichi Handa, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files),
Richard M Stallman <=
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system (was: ^M in the info files), Kenichi Handa, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/09
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/14
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/14
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/20
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/07/15
- Re: "no-conversion" coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/07/20