Re: line-move-visual never set to nil?

[Chong Yidong]

"T. V. Raman" <address@hidden> writes:

> I think line-move-visual should start off set consistent with
> visual-line-mode. I also think it should be renamed to match with
> visual-line-mode -- ie visual-line-move -- not line-move-visual ---
> otherwise users will never be able to discover and set it.

But line-move-visual (and word-wrap) can be turned on independently;
visual-line-mode simply goes a step further and rebinds some editing
keys in addition to setting line-move-visual and word-wrap.

How about renaming line-move-visual to line-move-by-screen-lines?