[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:03:03 +0300 |
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed
> version=3.1.0
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:21:58 -0700
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> > > Cc: address@hidden
> > > Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:43:01 -0700
> > >
> > > Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > Did we agree to remove these conditionals?
> > >
> > > The code now is cleaner and easier to read.
> >
> > So is that a NO?
>
> Sorry I am not playing the partial citation to distort the meaning game.
Dan what happened here? what ``meaning game''? I asked you a simple
question: did we agree to remove MULTI_KBOARD or didn't we? I asked
because I don't remember whether such a discussion took place and if
it did, what was the conclusion. Why won't you give me an answer to a
simple question?
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/08/01
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/08/01
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Richard M Stallman, 2008/08/02
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/08/02
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/02
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/08/02
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/02
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Jason Rumney, 2008/08/02
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Chong Yidong, 2008/08/02
- Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/02