[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
Paul R |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:46:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Stephen> Does anyone see a major flaw in a system like that? Or is it
Stephen> a matter of "show me the code and I'll comment"? ELPA could
Stephen> be the starting point.
Tom is the right person to ask, but I have the feeling that 2 points
at least need some special care :
- autoloads, or more generally "package activation"
- documentation, or "how to find in the Info system the entry to the
documentation of the installed package"
Other than that, a package management system would be of course
incredibly useful to emacs. We may even, at some point, use it to
lower the minimum size of the emacs base distribution. I often hear
that emacs distribution bundles way too many packages. And I sometime
experience this feeling too :)
--
Paul
- Re: Emacs Package Management, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/04
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2008/08/04
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/05
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stephen Eilert, 2008/08/05
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Paul R, 2008/08/05
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/05
Re: Emacs Package Management, Stephen Eilert, 2008/08/01
Re: Emacs Package Management, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/11
Re: Emacs Package Management,
Paul R <=