Re: Release plans

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote:
> A Soare wrote:
> > > > I told you: everything depends of education.
> > >  > No, from my viewpoint emacs is better.
> > > > But in the same time I realise that from their viewpoint other 
> > > > editors are better.
> > >  > I tolerate their education.
> > >
> > > But does not that mean that you say that your education is better? 
> > > That you have learned something that they have not (yet)?
> >
> > The word good-best-better is a kind of recursion in nature.
>
> Ok, it looked to me that you were trying to say that developing Emacs on 
> windows was useless because of your view. That would be a very 
> egocentric argument and not useful for conclusions about what to do.
>
> You have probably explained why it is not useful in a way that I have 
> missed.
>
> > If you take care about this definition, the loop dissapears. It 
> > reduces to discrimination. If you go on with further this discussion, 
> > you make discrimination. Everything is relative to this world. A fish 
> > cannot say that he leaves better than a man, and vice versa.
> > You did not understand. The web site where I have my pretty and most 
> > lovely mail account add this banner.
>
> Maybe, but what i wanted to say was that you mail program does not work 
> ok. So perhaps it would be best if you used some other mail program.

Or maybe it is rather a bug in Thunderbird client? I can see now that 
the lines gets wrapped in my reply, but I have trouble reading your 
message in Thunderbird when I am editing my reply.

This is quite annoying. Is there anyone who understand what is wrong?