[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release plans
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Release plans |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:21:01 -0400 |
Yes, indeed, but its also trivial to patch Emacs to run non-free
extensions today.
It is not trivial for most people.
Is the real issue that the GPL doesnt inhibit soft linking of non-free
modules? I always assumed the GPL didnt allow for this.
There is no clear simple answer to the question,
and that is why I don't want to run the risk.
- Re: Release plans, (continued)
- Re: Release plans, Johannes Weiner, 2008/08/16
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/15
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/16
- Re: Release plans, joakim, 2008/08/16
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, joakim, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/18
- Re: Release plans, Tassilo Horn, 2008/08/18
- Re: Release plans, Stefan Monnier, 2008/08/18
- Re: Release plans, joakim, 2008/08/18
- Re: Release plans,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: Release plans, Johannes Weiner, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Johannes Weiner, 2008/08/20
- Re: Release plans, Tassilo Horn, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Gilaras Drakeson, 2008/08/18
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/18
- Re: Release plans, Paul R, 2008/08/18
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/19