Re: Removing MULTI_KBOARD

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

  > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
  > > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
  > > Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:24:38 -0700
  > > 
  > > Was the removed MULTI_KBOARD code actually needed?
  > 
  > I don't know.  I debugged the current code, and never looked back,
  > because I knew it was pointless, and because in my experience
  > comparing with older versions is not an efficient way of debugging a
  > program.  It's all in the logs and in CVS, if you really want to know.

So you are in effect saying that you preemptive attack was baseless and
without any technical justification (the HR approach was so wrong that's
not even worth disscussing).  Refusing to provide a technical
justification after so many requests is quite telling.  Thank you.