Re: LGLYPH_SET_CODE

[Jason Rumney]

Kenichi Handa wrote:

> It is intended that VAL is not negative.  That macro is
> called at four places, and except for one place, it is
> assured that VAL is never negative.  The exception is in
> uniscribe_shape of w32uniscribe.c:
>
>                   LGLYPH_SET_CODE (lglyph, glyphs[j]);
>
> The type of glyphs[j] is "WORD" and I don't know if it's
> unsigned or not
>   

WORD is defined as below in the Windows system headers:

typedef unsigned short WORD;

So I think it is safe.