[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Meanness
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Meanness |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:10:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Saturday 26 July 2008, David Kastrup wrote:
> My experience with Windows-too projects runs quite contrary. The costs
> are in _no_ relation whatsoever to the benefits for the non-Windows
> parts (actually, their tend to be only costs for them, without
> benefits). And I don't see Emacs as an exception. The benefit for a
> Windows port lies in having a Windows port. If there were tangible
> other benefits, we could invent imaginary operating systems en gros and
> spend our time porting to them.
I know several people who began using Free Software systems because they first
used Emacs on Windows, moved to Cygwin, and eventually to entirely free
operating systems.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Meanness,
Daniel Colascione <=