[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail-mbox branch
From: |
Evil Boris |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail-mbox branch |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:53:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (windows-nt) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> Current Rmail doesn't keep the file in mbox format, but in Babyl.
> Decoding as I suggested leaves a valid Babyl file, yes.
I guess one can imagine a part whose decoding would introduce Babyl msg
separators, but I digress.
> Pmail will hold the original mbox (undecoded) format, so such decoding
> will not affect it in any way. The decoded text lives only as long as
> the message is displayed.
I did not realize that a decision was made to separate the presentation
from the mbox format, in Rmail/mbox. I recall a discussion about this
on emacs-devel, but did not remember the outcome.
This makes at least that objection go away. Thanks.
--Boris
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Evil Boris, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Evil Boris, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Evil Boris, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch,
Evil Boris <=
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/02
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/02
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/04
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/04
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/09/04