[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frame size changes
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Frame size changes |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:23:25 +0200 |
> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:11:38 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > If all you need is a flag saying that Emacs is being initialized, why
> > does it have to bear the value of current-time? why not just some
> > simple predicate? What am I missing?
>
> before-init-time and after-init-time have already been introduced in
> Emacs 23; see NEWS. The former is used for the new function
> emacs-uptime, the latter I'm unsure about.
>
> Since these variables already exist, my feeling is that it's better to
> use them rather than to come up with a new flag saying that Emacs is
> being initialized.
It is still not clean, IMO, to use these variables in order to decide
if we are initializing. For starters, I'm not sure it will work if
Emacs is dumped a second time.
- Re: Frame size changes, (continued)
- Re: Frame size changes, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/04
- Re: Frame size changes, Miles Bader, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Miles Bader, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Miles Bader, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/06
- Re: Frame size changes, Chong Yidong, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Chong Yidong, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Frame size changes, Chong Yidong, 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/10/05
- Re: Frame size changes, Jan Djärv, 2008/10/05