Re: SuperH port

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:

>> (To add some confusion, endian.h then also defines _all_ four of
>> __LITTLE_ENDIAN, LITTLE_ENDIAN, __BIG_ENDIAN, and BIG_ENDIAN,
>> regardless of the machine's byte sex. Go figure.)

> There is nothing wrong with that. They define the valid values for
> BYTE_ORDER.

Of course there's nothing wrong. But I think it's a bit awkward that
the same names are used for different purposes.

<offtopic>
On Powerpc, it's a complete mess: gcc defines both __BIG_ENDIAN__ and
_BIG_ENDIAN, and endian.h defines the four above-mentioned macros. ;-)
</offtopic>

Ulrich