[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes to completing-read
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Changes to completing-read |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:35:39 +0200 |
> From: Phil Hagelberg <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:31:21 -0700
>
> Is this accurate? Could someone explain the meaning of the mystery
> arguments?
Does it help to read the "Programmed Completion" node in the ELisp
manual?
In general, when writing Lisp programs, it is not recommended (and is
not enough) to read only the doc strings. The ELisp manual is a
required reading as well.