Re: Docstring of `decode-coding-string' a bit misleading about insertion in buffer

[Richard M. Stallman]

    > Anyway, if we
    > write "inserted in buffer (after point and markers)", I
    > think it means the text is inserted without moving point and
    > markers.

    I'm sure it means that. I think I would still have missed it, because
    I misread the "inserted" as related to `insert', which moves the
    point.

Traditionally, to "insert something after point" does mean that point
remains before it.  But not all users know this, so it is prone to
misunderstandings.  I agree it is better to use text that is more
explicit and less terse.