emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: annoying behavior of emacs --daemon


From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: annoying behavior of emacs --daemon
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:47:08 +0900

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
>  > >   > When using --daemon, you initially have no frames.  You can then make
>  > >   > new frames with emacsclient -c or emacsclient -t, but if they're X
>  > >   > frames, closing the last such created frame (with C-x # or C-x C-c)
>  > >   > kills the emacs process!
>
> I still cannot reproduce this, with emacs freshly checked out and after
> a "make maintainer-clean" and /bin/rm -f /tmp/emacs*/server
>
> Can you please try to debug and find out why emacs dies for you?

Hmm, it seems to segfault in xlib, though I'm not sure why.  I'm using
a gtk emacs; are you also?

1509        if (terminal->reference_count == 0)
(gdb) n
1515            Fdelete_terminal (tmp, NILP (force) ? Qt : force);
(gdb) n

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb780dfc0 in _XSend () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
(gdb) ba
#0  0xb780dfc0 in _XSend () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#1  0xb780e1b2 in _XFlush () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#2  0xb77e5d71 in XFlush () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#3  0xb7839700 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#4  0x0881a940 in ?? ()
#5  0xb78b53ec in ?? () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
#6  0xbfffb188 in ?? ()
#7  0xb7838de2 in _XimFlush () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC

Lisp Backtrace:
"delete-frame" (0xbfffc374)
"server-delete-client" (0xbfffc4b4)
"server-save-buffers-kill-terminal" (0xbfffc5e4)
"save-buffers-kill-terminal" (0xbfffc764)
"call-interactively" (0xbfffc924)

-Miles
-- 
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]