Re: Reviewing changes

[Stefan Monnier]

> IMO, if we cannot do it well, it isn't worth doing.

Sounds surprisingly dogmatic.

>> We already have code reviews, just rarely so.
> No, we don't.  What we have is random (and very rare) comments, and no
> mechanism to resolve disagreements when they happen.

So you object to naming them "code reviews"?  That's OK, let's call them
"random comments", then.

I just can't see how encouraging such random comments can hurt.


        Stefan