Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge

[Richard M Stallman]

    I guess the growth is not because of single change but
    because of summing up of many small changes.

Maybe that is true, or maybe one large change is responsible for .5
meg (say).  This is an empirical question, and rather than guess,
I am suggesting we find out the answer.

If indeed this growth is due to many small changes then probably there
is nothing to be done.  However, if one thing has eaten .5 meg, maybe
a few hours of work can eliminate that, and it would be worth trying.