[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: window-system-version on Windows
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: window-system-version on Windows |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:56:51 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > > The 3rd version of the native Windows GUI for Emacs? You can
> > > see that it's 11 for the X11 GUI.
> >
> > Yeah, but for example mule-diags concatenates window-system and
> > window-system-version to form "x11". On Windows it outputs
> > "Window-system: w323", which is quite meaningless.
>
> That'd be a bug, I'd say. How about "x, version 11" instead?
"X11" is the standard way to refer to "The X Window System, version
11". "x11" case-mangled but interpretable; "x, version 11" causes me
to double-take.
There are political reasons for not using Win32 like everybody else
does, I know, but why let that screw up a perfectly good custom for a
free windowing system?
Also, you phrase "3rd version ... for Emacs" is somewhat ambiguous,
but I'd take that as "the third try at a Windows GUI by the Emacs
project", not as "Microsoft's third version". OTOH, "X11" most
definitely means "version 11 as defined by the MIT/X Consortium".
- window-system-version on Windows, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/04
- Re: window-system-version on Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/04
- Re: window-system-version on Windows, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/04
- Re: window-system-version on Windows, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/05
- Re: window-system-version on Windows, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/12/05
- Re: window-system-version on Windows, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/05
- Re: window-system-version on Windows, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/12/05
- Re: window-system-version on Windows, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/06