Re: Undo-limit default

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:02 PM, martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:
> but I don't understand why we keep font-lock assigned properties (in
> particular the completely useless 'fontified property) on the undo-list.
> Here these usually account for more than 90% of all entries.

I thought that the `fontified' property did not go into the undo-list.
Are not the calls changing that property surrounded by macros that
should prevent that?

What major modes do you see this in?