[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject
From: |
Don Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:47:56 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> The bug tracker modifies the Subject lines, which breaks
> `rmail-next-same-subject' and `rmail-previous-same-subject'.
These commands have a fundamental problem; they really should be
rmail-next-in-thread, rmail-previous-in-thread.
> I think it's not clean to depend on Subject mangling by specific
> servers.
That's why References: and In-Reply-To: exist.
Don Armstrong
--
I learned really early the difference between knowing the name of
something and knowing something
-- Richard Feynman "What is Science" Phys. Teach. 7(6) 1969
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
- Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject,
Don Armstrong <=
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Glenn Morris, 2008/12/13
- Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Glenn Morris, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13