Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com

[Don Armstrong]

On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Glenn Morris wrote:
> I would very much appreciate some response to the bugs I have filed
> against emacsbugs. Thank you.

Haven't looked at any of those, sorry.
 
> http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> 
> (Especially 749

This requires a total revamp of how we're handling mail to
bugs-gnu-emacs; I have to talk with the mailman people to configure
this. [Basically, we'll send everything to one list, and then fork out
the messages that only should go to bug-gnu-emacs to it, and vice
versa for the control messages.

and 897.)

This would require serious tracking of message-ids, which is kind of a
PITA. A procmail msgid replay cache would handle this particular
sillyness.

> If there are not going to be any changes until it migrates to a GNU
> server, that is also useful to know.

Migrating is one of the first things that I need to do, but a whole
host of things have been higher on my priority list.


Don Armstrong

-- 
"I was thinking seven figures," he said, "but I would have taken a
hundred grand. I'm not a greedy person." [All for a moldy bottle of
tropicana.]
 -- Sammi Hadzovic [in Andy Newman's 2003/02/14 NYT article.]
 http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/14/nyregion/14EYEB.html

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu