[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in server-start
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: bug in server-start |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:28:33 +0100 |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 18:00, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
> What exactly made you think that I said the above message was not
> confusing???
I'm talking of the case where the user passes "server" as daemon name.
> Yes, if the user makes the conscious choice of passing an argument to
> --daemon, then you can mention it in the error message. If she doesn't,
> then there's little point of doing so, especially when the message is so
> short and unexplanatory.
As I've stated previously, I don't agree with the "there's little
point of doing so" part.
> The take home message here is that the error messages need a bit more
> thought put into them.
I've put some more thought into it, and I still don't agree with you.
Let's hear other people's opinions.
Juanma
- Re: bug in server-start, (continued)
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Chong Yidong, 2008/12/16
- Re: bug in server-start, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16