[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
From: |
Don Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:43:58 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> You don't know that.
Of course I know where the most ordinary form of a reply should go:
the bug, and the person sending the message.
> Only the person replying knows where that reply should go.
Enough people replying clearly have no clue where they should go;
hence this entire thread.
> Besides, I don't see why getting this result requires fiddling with
> the reply-to header. Can you give an example?
To: address@hidden
From: bar
Subj: Bug #1234: blah
Causes the following message to be sent to anyone who should get mail
involving bug 1234:
To: address@hidden
From: bar
Subj: Bug #1234: blah
Reply-To: address@hidden, bar
> ?? I don't understand. It does mean removing those addresses from
> pretty much all headers (not just To:), but I don't see why it
> should require replacing it with something bogus, or why it should
> be a big problem. Can you restate the problem?
It'd require changing To: in the above message to some address other
than the address the message was actually sent to, like address@hidden
Thus, a bogus value.
Debbugs is basically a huge wrapper around a mailing list per bug; the
issue we have now is that there are multiple aliases for the same
mailing list, and neither debbugs nor emacs-bugs does message-id
caching and /dev/null-ing, save on display of messages for debbugs.
Don Armstrong
--
There is no such thing as "social gambling." Either you are there to
cut the other bloke's heart out and eat it--or you're a sucker. If you
don't like this choice--don't gamble.
-- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p250
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
- Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, (continued)
- Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Glenn Morris, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/12/14
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/14
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Glenn Morris, 2008/12/14
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/14
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/17
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/17
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com,
Don Armstrong <=
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/18
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/12/14
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/13