Re: Terminology in multi-tty primitives

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

  > > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:39:28 -0800 (PST)
  > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
  > > Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
  > >         address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
  > > 
  > >   > For example, make-frame-on-tty does make sense on MS-DOS when its
  > >   > first arg is "/dev/tty" or "CON", so I didn't want it to fail just
  > >   > because it assumed that on a tty, the value of window-system _must_ be
  > >   > nil.
  > > 
  > > Then it would be better to just push the test inside the `window-system'
  > > form, rather that duplicate the whole call.
  > 
  > I don't mind making that change.
  > 
  > > there's a single user (in server.el) in the tree...
  > 
  > But that's true for many (most?) of the multi-tty features, isn't it?

Examples please.  If that's indeed that case, then they should get
similar treatment.