[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?
From: |
Richard M Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable? |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:59:27 -0500 |
So should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?
In general, it cannot be safe. Its value is a function.
But we could say that the value nil is safe for it.
Perhaps it is unfortunate that the variable which controls
Auto Fill mode has a function value rather than a boolean value.
If nobody makes use of the potential to specify different kinds of
auto-filling functions, perhaps we should replace it with a boolean
variable `auto-fill-mode'.
- Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Leo, 2009/01/06
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/06
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?,
Richard M Stallman <=
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/06
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/08
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Leo, 2009/01/09
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/09
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Leo, 2009/01/09
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/10
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Leo, 2009/01/10
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/11
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Reiner Steib, 2009/01/11
- Re: Should `auto-fill-function' be a safe local variable?, Leo, 2009/01/12