Re: x-font-family-list

[Chong Yidong]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> I don't think it's important, but am not sure whether there is any
>> external code relying on it.  Normally, this means that we should try to
>> change the compatibility function and make it compatible.  But, I don't
>> know a simple way of computing whether a font is fixed-pitch using the
>> new font code, without jumping through some ugly hoops (e.g., somehow
>> turning each family name into an xlfd and examining its "monospace"
>> entry).  If no one can suggest a good method, let's just delete the
>> function.
>
> Either delete it entirely, or make it signal an error.

I've removed it from CVS.