[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IMAP and Exchange 2007 - imap-fetch-safe
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: IMAP and Exchange 2007 - imap-fetch-safe |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:58:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
> Maybe the problem is a condition-case within another condition-case
> work? I recall problems related to this when run as an async process
> filter.
Yes -- signals from process filters are normally caught; I wasn't
thinking or looking closely enough at what the code does originally. I
must have had debug-on-error set when testing, but I was sure I'd
actually tried it in fresh Emacs.
> Maybe it is possible to re-write the approach without using
> condition-case, that would likely be easier to debug anyway.
I'm not sure it would be easier, but see the comment in the patch below.
I made it before reading this, and at least the fix over my previous
code is just an extra binding. It works for me in a fresh Emacs, and
isn't broken in Emacs 22.
> I'd prefer to avoid sending the Exchange bug-workaround approach
> ("1,*:*") to any server that does not need it. I've seen servers that
> (internally) open up all e-mails in the folder and searches them, but
> for the 1,* approach was able to return data quickly.
Obviously that's a good reason. Previous comments about efficiency that
I was referred to seemed to be about something different.
> This may be old
> information now, but generally I don't see why imap.el should send poor
> protocol output to all servers just because Exchange is broken.
[It does have workarounds for various other servers, not that I want to
defend Exchange in any way. Exchange 2007 is doing horrible things like
messing with MIME parts, which I don't think the previous version did,
and I wish I could avoid it.]
Anyhow, per the comment in the patch, is there a good reason -- other
than simplicity? -- to use FETCH rather than UID like other clients?
I'm speaking mostly in ignorance of IMAP...
2009-01-17 Dave Love <address@hidden>
* imap.el (imap-fetch-safe): Bind debug-on-error.
(imap-debug): Add imap-fetch-safe.
Index: imap.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/gnus/lisp/imap.el,v
retrieving revision 7.52
diff -u -r7.52 imap.el
--- imap.el 8 Jan 2009 20:51:29 -0000 7.52
+++ imap.el 17 Jan 2009 19:33:31 -0000
@@ -1798,25 +1800,38 @@
of the UIDS specification, and the cdr is the one which works with
Exchange 2007 or, potentially, other buggy servers.
See `imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround'."
- ;; We don't unconditionally use the alternative (valid) form, since
- ;; this is said to be significantly inefficient. The first time we
- ;; get here for a given, we'll try the canonical form. If we get
- ;; the known error from the buggy server, set the flag
- ;; buffer-locally (to account for connections to multiple servers),
- ;; then re-try with the alternative UIDS spec.
+ ;; The first time we get here for a given, we'll try the canonical
+ ;; form. If we get the known error from the buggy server, set the
+ ;; flag buffer-locally (to account for connections to multiple
+ ;; servers), then re-try with the alternative UIDS spec. We don't
+ ;; unconditionally use the alternative form, since the
+ ;; currently-used alternatives are seriously inefficient with some
+ ;; servers (although they are valid).
+ ;;
+ ;; FIXME: Maybe it would be cleaner to have a flag to not signal
+ ;; the error (which otherwise gives a message), and test
+ ;; `imap-failed-tags'. Also, Other IMAP clients use other forms of
+ ;; request which work with Exchange, e.g. Claws does "UID FETCH 1:*
+ ;; (UID)" rather than "FETCH UID 1,*". Is there a good reason not
+ ;; to do the same?
(condition-case data
- (imap-fetch (if imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround
- (cdr uids)
- (car uids))
- props receive nouidfetch buffer)
+ ;; Binding `debug-on-error' allows us to get the error from
+ ;; `imap-parse-response' -- it's normally caught by Emacs around
+ ;; execution of a process filter.
+ (let ((debug-on-error t))
+ (imap-fetch (if imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround
+ (cdr uids)
+ (car uids))
+ props receive nouidfetch buffer))
(error
(if (and (not imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround)
- (string-match
- "The specified message set is invalid"
- (cadr data)))
+ ;; This is the Exchange 2007 response. It may be more
+ ;; robust just to check for a BAD response to the
+ ;; attempted fetch.
+ (string-match "The specified message set is invalid"
+ (cadr data)))
(with-current-buffer (or buffer (current-buffer))
- (set (make-local-variable
- 'imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround)
+ (set (make-local-variable 'imap-enable-exchange-bug-workaround)
t)
(imap-fetch (cdr uids) props receive nouidfetch))
(signal (car data) (cdr data))))))
@@ -3023,6 +3038,7 @@
imap-list-to-message-set
imap-fetch-asynch
imap-fetch
+ imap-fetch-safe
imap-message-put
imap-message-get
imap-message-map