[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:19:29 +0100 |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 14:05, grischka <address@hidden> wrote:
> That is definitely an highly optimistic point of view.
Hmm... well, OK ;-)
> I've seen
> people here fighting to protect their bugs against fixes by any
> means including obviously false arguments or even loss in common
> standards of politeness.
I don't remember obviously false arguments (in the sense of the poster
knowing that they are false), though I've seen "loss [...] of
politeness" a few times.
> Reason seems to be that bugs like any code are considered copyrighted
> work and the only way for people to gain credit in an unpaid project is
> to see their work included in history. And of course bugs will produce
> more feedback by far than something that works flawlessly.
>
> So why should anyone be interested to throw away own work that is so
> well suited to get attention of the world as are bugs?
Sorry, I'm unable to take such a cynical view of Emacs development.
Perhaps you're right by calling me "highly optimistic".
Juanma
- Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system, (continued)
- Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system, Jason Rumney, 2009/01/21
- Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system, MON KEY, 2009/01/21
- Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/21
- Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system, MON KEY, 2009/01/21
- Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/21
Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system, grischka, 2009/01/21
- Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system,
Juanma Barranquero <=