[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving to bzr?
From: |
John Yates |
Subject: |
Re: Moving to bzr? |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:33:08 -0500 |
Jason Earl wrote:
>> I also think that it might be a good idea to wait for some of the
>> current repository format changes to land. The new format in 1.9 is a
>> definite improvement, but I think that it would be wise to at least wait
>> until one of the rich-root variants becomes the default format.
Stefan Monnier replied:
>Based on the last discussion around rich-root becoming the default, I'd
>say "don't hold your breath".
Rich-root support is available today. Any new bzr format will always be
rolled out accompanied by a rich-root variant.
That defaulting to rich-root may take bzr some time does that preclude
the emacs project from initializing its master repository as rich-root?
After that would not rich-rootiness simply propagate to new branches?
/john
- Re: bzr repository ready?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/30
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/31
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/01/31
- Re: Moving to bzr?,
John Yates <=
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/21
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/22
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Giorgos Keramidas, 2009/01/13
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Karl Fogel, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Nick Roberts, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/05
- Re: Moving to bzr?, dhruva, 2009/01/05