[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest next week
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest next week |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:40:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> As it turns out, this isn't needed. SIGALRM is triggering
> alarm_signal_handler() in atimer.c correctly, but run_timers() never gets
> called under SYNC_INPUT. I don't fully understand why or where the problem
> is here. But undefining SYNC_INPUT gets poll_for_input() called (and hence
> Ctrl-g detected) even in tight loops, with no ill effects so far.
I wrote SYNC_INPUT specifically for X11 input handling. From what you
say above, there is apparently a bug in the way it handles SIGALRM.
Apparently the QUIT macro should check pending_atimers somehow.
Can you try to tweak QUIT so it does
else if (pending_atimers)
run_timers;
to see if it fixes your problem? If so, we should probably create a new
var `pending_signals', which should always reflect
"pending_timers || interrupt_input_pending", then QUIT can check this
var, and if set, it can call a new function `process_pending_signals'
which will then look at pending_timers and interrupt_input_pending to
figure out which function(s) to call.
pending_timers and process_pending_timers are desired/needed to reduce
the code-size (the QUIT macro is expanded at many places), as well as to
reduce the polling overhead.
Stefan
- Re: Pretest next week, (continued)
- Re: Pretest next week, Jason Rumney, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/27
- Re: Pretest next week, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/27
- Re: Pretest next week, Jason Rumney, 2009/01/28
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/28
- Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/28
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/28
- Re: Pretest next week,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/28
- Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/28
- Re: Pretest next week, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/28
- Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/28
Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/22
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/22
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/24
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/26