[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in rmail-reply
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Change in rmail-reply |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:36:06 +0900 |
Richard M Stallman writes:
> The RFC is clear, but it seems to be clearly wrong. If John Doe sends
> a message to you, and you resend it to me, and I do "reply to all", it
> seems clear that my reply should by default go to [you]
If the resender wishes to indicate interest in the conversation, they
can do this in a number of ways, including adding themselves as a CC,
specifying a Reply-To header, or forwarding the message (ie,
encapsulating the original text in a new message with themselves in
the From header).
> and to all the other people you resent it to -- as well as to the
> sender and recipients of the original message.
>
> Can anyone present an argument in support of what the RFC says?
In my experience the most frequent users of Resent-* headers are not
human agents, but daemons. I see no good to come of automatically
adding their addresses to the reply-to list.
- Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/26
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/26
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/01/27
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/29
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/29
- Re: Change in rmail-reply,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Chetan Pandya, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Chetan Pandya, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Jason Rumney, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Chetan Pandya, 2009/01/30
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/31
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Chetan Pandya, 2009/01/31
- Re: Change in rmail-reply, Jason Rumney, 2009/01/30