[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:47:53 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:28:41 +0100
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Cc: Don Armstrong <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:19, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I'm not following: if there's no Rmail package, how come the
> > bug tracker finds bugs by that package? What am I missing?
>
> At the moment, "packages" in the Emacs bugtracker are just arbitrary
> labels. The tracker allows searching for these labels.
It's a bad thing to call "package" to two different things. How about
calling the labels "labels" instead?
> A package, apparently, is a label plus some other data, like a
> maintainer name & address, etc. There's no package defined for Emacs.
Fine, but the "don't submit bug reports" request is misleading and
should be removed or rephrased, IMO.
- Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/31