[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:22:56 -0500 |
Glenn Morris wrote (on Sun, 1 Feb 2009 at 21:20 -0500):
> Since we assign bugs to both the emacs _and_ the rmail package, does
> this mean we will start getting two copies of things? I regret to say
> I am confused.
I think Jason had it right:
For other sub-packages that come under the umbrella of the emacs
developers, we have assigned bugs to "emacs,PACKAGE", so that the
sub-package can be used as a filter in the web interface, but the emacs
maintainers continue to be kept in the loop.
[...]
People don't file bugs against those packages, since the only address
for filing bugs is for emacs. But they might get reassigned later.
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Jason Rumney, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/01
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Glenn Morris, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/02
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/01