Re: rmail-toggle-header problem

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:12:05 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> So should it not yank the headers at all? Should it always yank the
> "condensed" headers? Should it yank the headers as displayed (the
> current behaviour)? Should it exclude "X-RMAIL"? Etc...
> 
> I have no opinion, I'm wondering what Rmail users want.

I vote for the current behavior.  Wrt the "X-RMAIL" header (or any
other headers added by Rmail), I don't care either way, although the
pre-mbox Rmail does copy the X-Coding-System header added by Rmail.