Re: Small patch for rng-valid.el

[Jason Rumney]

Lennart Borgman wrote:
> However the check for a non-nil rng-validate-up-to-date-end in
> rng-after-change-function is very cheap so I see no good reason not to
> add it there now.
>   

The good reason is that Emacs is in a state of "regression bugfixes 
only" code freeze.  Checking in a change to workaround a bug in third 
party code that the developer would prefer not to bother fixing right 
now is not an option at this stage.