Re: please make line-move-visual nil

[T.V. Raman]

But I'd still like to see the default behavior set so that visual line
movement is not active.
   > This must be resolved before the release.

   > But I understand your point. Moreover, some time ago I also was
   > very frustrated, because convinient way for "phisical" line
   > navigation is no less.

   It is resolved: there is an easy and convenient way to get "physical
   line navigation", which is (setq line-move-visual nil).

   I do not think there is a real need to have both screen-line and
   logical-line movement available at the same time with convenient keys.

   Stefan

-- 


On 6/1/09, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> This must be resolved before the release.
>
>>    But I understand your point.  Moreover, some time ago I also was
>>    very frustrated, because convinient way for "phisical" line
>>    navigation is no less.
>
> It is resolved: there is an easy and convenient way to get "physical
> line navigation", which is (setq line-move-visual nil).
>
> I do not think there is a real need to have both screen-line and
> logical-line movement available at the same time with convenient keys.
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
>