[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: utf8 char display in buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: utf8 char display in buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:07:13 -0400 |
> The GTK method does screw up one good thing about emacs' method -- the
> boxes it displays are generally the correct width (single- or double-
> width [CJK etc]), so text alignment is preserved.
Er, to be more clear, that should be "the boxes _emacs_ displays are
generally the correct width...".
Another idea is to display the bottom byte of the character code as
hex in the box. Maybe two hex digits can fit if they are small, and
the user would sometimes be able to identify the character from those.
Another idea is to display in the box a slightly smaller version of
the character which the bottom byte represents.
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, (continued)
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2009/06/12
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Miles Bader, 2009/06/12
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2009/06/12
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Richard Stallman, 2009/06/13
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Miles Bader, 2009/06/15
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Richard Stallman, 2009/06/15
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, James Cloos, 2009/06/15
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Miles Bader, 2009/06/15
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Miles Bader, 2009/06/15
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Chong Yidong, 2009/06/16
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/16
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Chong Yidong, 2009/06/15
- RE: utf8 char display in buffer, Drew Adams, 2009/06/15
- Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Richard Stallman, 2009/06/16
Re: utf8 char display in buffer, ken, 2009/06/12
Re: utf8 char display in buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/14