Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends

[Jason Rumney]

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I just read the docs, which claim there is a good reason for file-
> oriented VCSes to come first.  If the docs are wrong, they should be
> fixed.

The docs/comments mention the concurrent use of RCS and CVS, but I'm not 
sure that anyone has ever expressed a real interest in combining SCCS 
with other vc backends in this way (other than it can theoretically be 
done). These days the more common use case for multiple vc backends is 
probably combining a local distributed vc backend with a public CVS or 
SVN repository.