[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful |
|
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:07:54 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> C-x k RET C-x C-f M-p instead of C-x C-v,
Another difference is that M-p places point at the end, whereas C-x C-v
places it after the directory component.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, (continued)
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/09
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/09
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/09
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2009/07/09
- RE: C-x C-v considered harmful, Bob Rogers, 2009/07/10
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/13
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/16
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, M Jared Finder, 2009/07/02
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Miles Bader, 2009/07/02
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Miles Bader, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Markus Triska, 2009/07/03
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/05
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Bob Rogers, 2009/07/05
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/11
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Bob Rogers, 2009/07/13
- Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/14
Re: C-x C-v considered harmful, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/02