[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-visual
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-visual |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:14:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
Hi!
>> Options should be "nil" and "t", or the question should be "Should
>> line-move-visual default to nil".
>
> Er, yes. Another try:
>
> http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/623323-182852
I'm missing this vote option:
Yes and no. Either it should be disabled completely, or full
visual-line-mode should be enabled by default. These inconsistencies
between visual lines with C-n/C-p and logical lines with C-k/C-e/C-e
are the worst-case default.
Bye,
Tassilo
- Re: line-move-visual, (continued)
- Re: line-move-visual, Juri Linkov, 2009/07/11
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Sean O'Rourke, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual,
Tassilo Horn <=
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- RE: line-move-visual, Drew Adams, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Ulrich Mueller, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Christian Faulhammer, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Ulrich Mueller, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Bastien, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10