[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-visual
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-visual |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:49:50 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> The "C-n/C-p and C-a/C-e inconsistency" of the default settings is
> intentional.
> Having used the current defaults for a fairly long period, and of course
> "traditional" emacs for untold eons before that, I've come to the
> conclusion that Chong made the right choice.
> I get annoyed sometimes too by C-n/C-p's behavior -- but the traditional
> behavior annoyed me _more_ often. I think there is _no_ setting which
> will please all people, or even one person all the time, but the current
> compromise seems to be pretty decent.
If we need two different operations, the normal way is to
use two different keys.
I'm using <up> and <down> (arrow keys) for visual line move,
and C-p and C-n for logical line move. At least, this
setting please myself all the time.
I'm also using <C-left> and <C-right> for
beginning-of-visual-line and end-of-visual-line
respectively. This is very convenient too.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: line-move-visual, (continued)
Re: line-move-visual, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Johan Myréen, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Bastien, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/11
- Re: line-move-visual,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/11
Re: line-move-visual, Bastien, 2009/07/11
Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
Re: line-move-visual, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/10
Re: line-move-visual, Andrey Paramonov, 2009/07/11