[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blunderbuss ".dir-locals.el" raises everything in its path!!
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Blunderbuss ".dir-locals.el" raises everything in its path!! |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:02:55 +0900 |
Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
> Why on earch does .dir-locals.el take precedence over values set in a
> top-level `setq' or `c-mode-hook'? This is surely the Wrong Thing to
> do. Jan hat set his own desired value of c-cleanup-list (as a top-level
> command), only to have it obliterated by this line:
..
> Yes, we both agree on what is happening. My point is that the contents
> of .dir-locals.el should not override explicit values given by the user
> in his .emacs.
That seems quite arguable... most hook settings are probably intended
for the average case, and are done unconditionally. For something like
C indentation settings, probably .dir-locals.el _should_ override the
hook, as those settings are more specific than the hook settings.
There are probably other examples where the opposite order seems better,
but I dunno...
-Miles
--
Dictionary, n. A malevolent literary device for cramping the growth of
a language and making it hard and inelastic. This dictionary, however,
is a most useful work.
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., (continued)
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/19
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/20
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Juri Linkov, 2009/07/21
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Lennart Borgman, 2009/07/21
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., martin rudalics, 2009/07/22
- Re: Infrastructural complexity., Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/22
- Re: Blunderbuss ".dir-locals.el" raises everything in its path!!, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/14
- Re: Blunderbuss ".dir-locals.el" raises everything in its path!!,
Miles Bader <=