emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blunderbuss ".dir-locals.el" raises everything in its path!!


From: Ken Raeburn
Subject: Re: Blunderbuss ".dir-locals.el" raises everything in its path!!
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:18:17 -0400

On Jul 13, 2009, at 04:19, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
No.  They should act as a project wide default, which a user can
occasionally vary as he sees fit. The problem is not that .dir- locals.el
exists, but that it takes precedence over a user's c-mode-hook, or a
top-level (setq c-cleanup-list) in .emacs.  Jan complained that he was
left with no way to set c-cleanup-list. (M-: (setq ....) doesn't count
as "a way" here.)

Isn't it just as much a problem if c-cleanup-list is set in file local variables?

c-cleanup-list is partly project conventions (in that it can implement
formatting rules), partly personal preference (in that it enables
electric action in a C buffer). For example, a project may specify the
'brace-else-brace' convention (see page "Clean-ups" in the CC Mode
manual), but a hacker may not want this to be done electrically in his
Emacs.

Maybe the formatting rules and electric actions need to be better separated, so a project can control formatting and let the user dictate electric action (or, which actions should be done electrically, when they're enabled at all). Maybe c-cleanup-list should never be set in either .dir-locals.el or in file local variables in a shared and published project.

On the other hand, the first message in this thread was more about c- file-style, which seems to me to be entirely appropriate for either .dir-locals.el or file local variables, in shared code where different people may have different personal styles that should not be imposed on the project. It can't force them to obey the project style guidelines, but it can make it more easy and natural to do so.

I haven't experimented much with .dir-locals.el, but browsing the documentation and code suggests that the application and "safeness" tests apply to the combination of file local variables and .dir- locals.el settings, so I don't see much difference conceptually as to whether certain variables should or should not be set in one but not the other.

Ken




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]