[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:13:54 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
Richard, is it OK with you to keep the following features only for a
proprietary platform (Cocoa) in the Emacs 23.1 release? Note that the
GNUstep port is now completely unusable.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
>>>>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:12:45 +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden>
>>>>> said:
> What I removed was:
> 1. Code for stippling. This is wrongly implemented as tiling, which
> has been controversial whether or not to be included in the other
> platforms, IIUC.
> 2. Code for interpreting incompatible color formats: RGBrrggbb,
> ARGBaarrggbb, HSVhhssvv, AHSVaahhssvv, and CMYKccmmyykk. Besides
> the format itself, support for the alpha-component in color is
> not found in the other platforms but not inherently NS-specific.
> 3. Lisp primitive ns-set-alpha (nsfns.m), which sets the alpha
> component of the given color to the specified value. As in the
> argument for the alpha-component above, this is not inherently
> NS-specific.
> 4. Lisp function ns-set-background-alpha (ns-win.el), which sets
> alpha-component of frame background color. It is different from
> the frame parameter `alpha' as Adrian explained. Again, this is
> not inherently NS-specific.
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, (continued)
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Jason Rumney, 2009/07/23
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/24
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Miles Bader, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/25
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/26
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/07/26
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Clifford Wulfman, 2009/07/27
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/28
- Re: Changes 2009-07-15/16 in branch?, Clifford Wulfman, 2009/07/28