[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3
|
From: |
Leo |
|
Subject: |
Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:10:22 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On 2009-08-03 21:29 +0100, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> It can be seen that 23.1 is quite a bit slower, and that it has a lot
> of extra calls to char_table_ref. Are those calls necessary?
Thank you for the quantitative results. From experience, there is
slowdown in Emacs 23.
--
Leo's Emacs uptime: 17 hours, 6 minutes, 51 seconds
- profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/03
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3,
Leo <=
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Chong Yidong, 2009/08/04
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/05
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/25
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/25
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/26