[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are there two dolist?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Why are there two dolist? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:48:51 +0900 |
Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
>> Anyway, the two-dolists are not the prettiest thing in the world, but
>> they work fine, and there's a reason for having them.
>
> And how to get the correct version during compilation? (If that is
> possible...)
If you depend on cl.el extensions, then use (eval-when-compile (require 'cl)).
Otherwise, don't worry about it.
-Miles
--
"Don't just question authority,
Don't forget to question me."
-- Jello Biafra
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, (continued)
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11