[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: point-min and 1
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: point-min and 1 |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:50:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> That's exactly why you don't have a point. Every second use of "think"
> is within the idiom "I think", and yet we don't use a separate word for
> it. Because we don't need a separate word for a common simple idiom
> comprised of elementary parts.
If every second use of "think" were within the idiom "I, David Kastrup,
think" we probably would have a spearate word for it ...
martin
- Re: point-min and 1, (continued)
- Re: point-min and 1, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/12
- Re: point-min and 1, Miles Bader, 2009/08/12
- Re: point-min and 1, Daniel Colascione, 2009/08/12
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, Chong Yidong, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, David Kastrup, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: point-min and 1, Miles Bader, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, David Kastrup, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
Re: point-min and 1, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/11