Re: process-file and Tramp's file cache

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Let's go with your suggestion, but limited to a boolean for now (so the
>> name shouldn't end with "-list").

> Shouldn't it `process-file-modification-p' then?

No: the "-p" is for functions returning booleans, not for variables.
Note that "-flag" is not a good idea either, because it's incompatible
with any future extension to additional values (e.g. a list of files).
I suggest `process-file-side-effects'.


        Stefan