[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3 |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:18:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:39:47PM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote:
> In article <address@hidden>, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> It seems that c-indent-region has been changed a lot. I'm not sure,
> but perhaps that is the reason [for a slowdown]. How do the other
> people think?
The change was a bug fix. It shouldn't have slowed down indentation, at
least not by more than epsilon.
> ---
> Kenichi Handa
> address@hidden
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, (continued)
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/24
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/25
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/25
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Andreas Schwab, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/26
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3, Kenichi Handa, 2009/08/27
- Re: profiling emacs-23.1 vs emacs-22.3,
Alan Mackenzie <=