[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New sync'd branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: New sync'd branch |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:44:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> - People installing changes need to carefully choose whether to install
>> it on the 23 branch (from where it will be sync'd to the "24 branch"
>> aka "trunk"), or on the trunk. Basically, the most important aspect
>> is that any bugfix which makes sense on the 23 branch need to be
>> installed on the 23 branch rather than on the trunk.
> I don't know how things are set up, so what I don't understand is
> whether the «new trunk» will be a complete superset of «23 branch»?
Yes, that's what:
- Changes on the 23 branch need to be sync'd to the trunk. As long as
we haven't switched to Bzr, that means we need Miles to do the sync
for us. Miles, could you do that?
refers to. Miles? What's your verdict?
Stefan
- New sync'd branch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/23
- Re: New sync'd branch, joakim, 2009/08/23
- Re: New sync'd branch, Dmitry Dzhus, 2009/08/24
- Re: New sync'd branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: New sync'd branch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/26
- Re: New sync'd branch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Teemu Likonen, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/28
- Re: New sync'd branch, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Teemu Likonen, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Christian Faulhammer, 2009/08/27
- Re: New sync'd branch, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/27